BruceSpeaks

posted by Bruce Porter on כ"ט תשרי תשע"א כ"ג טבת תש"ל

You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.
Things that we had postponed for too long,
that were long-term, are now immediate
and must be dealt with.
This crisis provides the opportunity
 for us to do things that you could not do before.

 –Rahm Emanuel
Chief of Staff to Pres. Barack Hussein Obama
to a Wall Street Journal conference of top corporate chief executives

Memo from Bruce Porter:
For the past year I have frequently written and spoken my misgivings about the H1N1 “Swine Flu” crisis. Some have sought to marginalize my concerns by attacking me personally, or by retreating to the intellectually bankrupt tactic of namecalling. Such is the state of public discourse we find ourselves in. Truth is often sacrificed on the altar of irrational fears, and some people just can’t “go there” when I comes to dealing with unpleasant facts.

I reiterate my previous statement. I believe the present administration is deliberately manipulating people through disinformation to induce them to accept greater and greater government control over nearly every aspect of our lives. To the Left and Progressives, each crisis is an opportunity to expand their power and control by first causing (or encouraging) a crisis, and then riding to the rescue to “fix” the problem they created in the first place.

The “Swine Flu” crisis is, I believe, just one of many strategies by the Obama administration to foment public fear and administer a dangerous, (and highly questionable) vaccine that is increasingly causing alarm in the health care community. I offer the following article, reprinted from the New Media Journal. Also, at the end of the article I am posting a video interview with CBS and Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius. After it, I will post a rebuttal.

Dr. Elaina George, MD
October 30, 2009

There has been a lot of confusion about what ingredients are in the H1N1 Vaccine. In order to distill the information to make it easier for you to make an informed choice, here is a brief synopsis of the information provided by the manufacturers in their package inserts.

There are 4 manufactures who have been approved to sell H1N1 vaccine in the US. They are: Novartis, CSL, Sanofi/Pasteur and MedImmune

1) Novartis makes an injectable vaccine for ages 4 and above. The ingredients include:

▪ Thimerosal (Mercury) both in the single dose and the multi dose vials

▪ Antibiotics – polymyxin and neomycin (can be neurotoxic)

▪ It is manufactured with phenol (the chemical used on skin in cosmetic face peals to remove wrinkles)

They recommend that children ages 4-9 get 2 injections one month apart. This would increase the risk from a reaction to the mercury (e.g, neurological damage such as Gullain-Barre or possibly Autism)

2) CSL makes an injectable vaccine. Only the multi dose vial contains thimerosal

3) Sanofi/Pasteur – Only the multi dose vial contains thimerosal. This vaccine is made with polyethelene glycol (antifreeze) and formaldehyde (a chemical used in embalming).
Vaccines 1-3 are grown in chicken embryo cells. So if a person has severe allergies to eggs, they are at risk of having an allergic reaction and should therefore not take the vaccine.

4) MedImmune makes a live attenuated H1N1 vaccine that has an intranasal delivery. It does not contain thimerosal, but has the food additive MSG (monosodium glutamate) which can cause reactions in some people who are sensitive, it also contains gentamycin (an antibiotic which can be neurotoxic and cause hearing loss)
As per the package inserts from all of the manufacturers:

“Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
Neither FLUVIRIN nor the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”

In other words, NONE of the H1NI vaccines have been evaluated for the possible potential to cause cancer, birth defects or its effect on fertility. This is according to the information from all of the manufacturers.

About Dr. Elaina George, MD
Dr. Elaina George is a physician in Atlanta, Georgia. She is a medical correspondent and a contributor
to various multi-media outlets. Dr. George is a Forensic Consultant with American Medical Forensic Specialists. She is a keynote speaker with the American Enterprise Institute’s speakers bureau and a medical correspondent for YourBlackWorld.com.

Note from Bruce: I do not believe Sec. Sebelius. She has long been a champion of the unrestricted murder of unborn children, and as the governor of Kansas, resisted any effort to restrict inutero child homocide. You can gain more information about her from the following link: CLICK HERE

The following video is a rebuttal to her assertions about the safety of the H1N1 vaccines.

You now have a serious decision to make. Pray hard.

posted by Bruce Porter on כ"ה סיון תש"ע כ"ג טבת תש"ל

 Is Big Brother Watching You?

“ Just because you’re not paranoid doesn’t mean someone isn’t out to get you.”
Unknown

“Surveillance (pronounced /sərˈveɪ.əns/ or /sərˈveɪləns/^[1]) is the monitoring of the behavior of a person or group of people, often in a surreptitious manner. Although the word surveillance in French literally means “watching over”,^[2] the term is often used for all forms of observation or monitoring, not just visual observation.”
–From Wikipedia

Every phone call, email or website visit will be monitored by the state under plans to be unveiled next week. 

The proposals will give police and security services the power to snoop on every single communication made by the public with the data then likely to be stored in an enormous national database.

The precise content of calls and other communications would not be accessible but even text messages and visits to social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter would be tracked.

The move has alarmed civil liberty campaigners, and the country’s data protection watchdog last night warned the proposals would be “unacceptable”.

Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, will argue the powers are needed to target terrorists and serious criminals who are taking advantage of the increasing complex nature of communications to plot atrocities and crimes.

A consultation document on the plans, known in Whitehall as the Interception Modernisation Programme, is likely to put great emphasis on the threat facing Britain and warn the alternative to the powers would be a massive expansion of surveillance.

But that will fuel concerns among critics that the Government is using a climate of fear to expand the surveillance state.

Information Commissioner Richard Thomas, the country’s data watchdog, told the Daily Telegraph: “I have no problem with the targeted surveillance of terrorist suspects. 

“But a Government database of the records of everyone’s communications – if that is to be proposed – is not likely to be acceptable to the British public. Remember that records – who? when? where? – can be highly intrusive even if no content is collected.”

It is understood Mr Thomas is concerned that even details on who people contact or sites they visit could intrude on their privacy, such as data showing an individual visiting a website selling Viagra.

Chris Kelly, Facebook’s chief privacy officer, last month revealed he was considering lobbying ministers over the proposal, which he described as “overkill”.

The proposed powers will allow police and security services to monitor communication “traffic”, which is who calls, texts, emails who, when and where but not what is said.

Similarly they will be able to see which websites someone visits, when and from where but not the content of those visits.

However, if the data sets alarm bells ringing, officials can request a ministerial warrant to intercept exactly what is being sent, including the content.

The consultation is expected to include three options on how the “traffic” information is then stored: a “super database” held by the Government, a database held and run by a quango or private company at arms’ length, or an order to communication providers to store every detail in their own systems, which can then be accessed by the security services is necessary.

A memo written by sources close to the project and leaked last year revealed it was fraught with technical difficulties.

Ms Smith has already claimed local authorities will not have access to the data but the Tories have warned of the “exponential increase in the powers of the state”, while the Liberal Democrats have dubbed the plans “Orwellian” and deeply worrying. 

Security services fear a failure to monitor all forms of communications effectively will hamper their ability to combat terrorists and serious criminals. Sir Stephen Lander, chairman of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, said: “Any significant reduction in the capability of law enforcement agencies to acquire and exploit intercept intelligence and evidential communications data would lead to more unsolved murders, more firearms on our streets, more successful robberies, more unresolved kidnaps, more harm from the use of Class A drugs, more illegal immigration and more unsolved serious crime.”

To view the original article, click on the link below
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5215413/Every-phone-call-email-or-website-visit-to-be-monitored.html